Tuesday 26 February 2013

Comparing my old logo and new logo together


This is my old Logo that was on the first draft of my magazine. I took it off for the second draft because I thought it looked tacky and unprofessional. Things that I done wrong when I made this logo is that I left white space between the letters, making the quality look bad. Also because it has a grey murky background, it means that it doesn't blend in with the current white background of my magazine. By having 'TUNED IN' written across the music note is also unneeded because the readers can already see the name of my magazine.


After my second draft, I decided that my magazine looked bare and boring without a logo on it. I made a new one (below) to make my magazine recognisable and look more professional. 

I think that this logo is much better than the one before. It is more simple which is good because if it was really detailed, it would look seem too busy and less focus would be on the magazine. Also it is unique because the music notes symbolises the reason of this magazine (music) so even if it is not clear what type of magazine it is, the logo should give it away to the audience. Lastly, by using two bright colours it makes the logo stand out but not too much that it takes over the pages. It is also recognisable to have on the front page and contents page.

No comments:

Post a Comment